نوع مقاله : مقاله تخصصی
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
A comparative analysis of exegetical interpretations of Quranic verses and themes – such as the method of understanding divine intent – relies on evaluating the views of scholars against Quranic, rational, and transmitted evidence. Ibn Ashur and Allamah Tabatabai both adopt the Quran-centered exegesis approach (tafsir bi al-Qur’an), making their comparative study significant for discerning the intended meaning of verses within their contextual framework. Surah Al-Baqarah, Verse 124, beyond narrating Prophet Ibrahim’s (PBUH) dialogue with God and his requests, contains pivotal Quranic concepts such as trial (ibtila), words (kalimat), and imamate (leadership). Understanding these terms profoundly shapes Muslim theological and ideological perspectives on divine trials and the foundational concept of imamate. This study, employing a descriptive-analytical methodology, examines the interpretations of these two scholars regarding Verse 124, focusing on: Key Quranic terms (ibtila , kalimat , imamate); Prophet Ibrahim’s (PBUH) supplication for granting imamate to his progeny; God’s response to his request. The findings of this study reveal that both scholars share a common contextual framework for interpreting the verse and express similar views on Abraham’s supplication and God’s reply. However, they diverge on the timing of Ibrahim’s trial and the interpretation of the Quranic terms mentioned. Ibn Ashur aligns his interpretation of these terms with traditional Sunni exegesis (e.g., early scholars of both Sunni and Shia schools). Allamah Tabatabai, however, proposes a novel interpretation grounded in multiple Quranic verses, offering a distinct analysis of the debated terms.
کلیدواژهها English
قرآن کریم (۱۳۸۶). مترجم: مهدی الهی قمشهای، چ4، قم، چاپ دانش.
